Racist comments and jokes, however inadvertent, constitute intermittent clues that we have not yet crossed over into the Promised Land envisioned by Martin Luther King in 1968.
- These inconvenient reminders cannot be excused away. A defense of Kelly Tilghman or Don Imus might be:
Well, they're always talking, 24-7! Some things, during some understandable lapses, are bound to slip out.
The solution is to spend less time in front of the open mic and more time in front of an open book. Try reviewing American history, for example. Checkout the American holocaust about which you're apparently in denial. - Print journalists are in jeapardy if they try to be as colorful as bloggers. In the blogosphere, we constantly review, revise, and ultimately delete if we recognize our clay feet in our mouths. But it's hard to recall the cover of a national magazine.
- Additionally, Politicians on the primary campaign trail, 24-7. You boys and girls are in a very risky situation, what with all of the minicams out there recording any unguarded moment. This came to me watching a close-up of JRE in a recent debate. Edwards looked like he had gravel in his stomach, gravel in his mouth, and gravel in his ears. His whole exhausted countenence indicated that he was thinking, "How much more of this unadulterated bull shit can I take." The fatigue has got be a 100 times more for the candidates than for the rest of us. I totally excuse their guarded, carefully worded responses to specific questions. But they too, like talk journalists, need to take some down time and read a little, reflect and re-charge.
- Finally, as Dwyre writes,
Racism needs to be reported. Blatant, inadvertent, miscalculated, all kinds.
We can't afford to lose all persepective, but it has to be recognized for what it is and talked about. And a Tilghman or Imus might have to take a time out before we can move on. But this stuff has to be aired out in the sun.
The Progressive Effect:
ReplyDeleteThe big picture is the Democratic turnout:
Iowa............66%
New Hampshire...55%
Nevada..........73%
Michigan (no democratic primary)
Sen. Barack Obama appeals strongly to affluent whites and minorities -- the old John Lindsay coalition -- but he seems to lose working-class whites. Moreover, if the pollsters turn out to have been wrong in predicting the outcome in New Hampshire in part because of the "Bradley effect" -- that is, the polling tendency to overestimate the number of votes a black candidate will win because some bigoted whites refuse to speak to pollsters or claim to be undecided -- then Democrats may also be deceiving themselves about the Illinois senator's chances in the general election. National surveys that show Obama beating various Republicans may be overstating his potential share of the vote.
ReplyDeleteImagine if Hillary does well in the general election polls all year long, and then gets crushed on election day, as hordes of voters - in the privacy of the voting booth - decide not to entrust the nuclear football to a woman.
ReplyDeletePoliPundit
What name shall we give this effect?
Good comments, sensible and doable Vigil...
ReplyDeleteIs there really any statistical proof of the Bradley effect? A lot of people were saying that New Hampshire folks just take insult when they are asked who they voted for and then lie. I also heard a statistical guy saying that there are many, many examples of people really voting for the black candidates they'd said they'd vote for.
ReplyDeleteWhat Tom Brady effect?
ReplyDeleteOops! My bad!
ReplyDelete