Saddam wasn't elected? (Twice!)
On it Being One thing for Guys Like Dan Bongino to Talk About DEI Whenever
and as They See Fit (and I Fully Agree with Them On the Topic), but it's a
Much, Mush Different Thing for the President of the U.S.A. to Drone On and
On About it Hours After a Tragedy
-
I don't appreciate it when the Dems bring up gun control after every
shooting (i.e., using a tragic event to further a political agenda) and so
for me to...
5 hours ago
%20Mark%20Joseph%20Stern%20I%20really%20can%E2%80%99t%20wrap%20my%20head%20around%20congressional%20Democrats%E2%80%99%20response%20to%20the%20past%2012%20days%20of%20crises.%20It%20reeks%20of%20pathetic%20capitulation.%20Trump%20is%20asserting%20dictatorial%20pow%5B...%5D.png)
I score it 2-1 in Saddam's favor, over Bush in terms of starting costly wars.
ReplyDeleteHey, when we - I mean "they" - hang Saddam, can we finally leave? Huh?
ReplyDeleteRecidivist, The fact that Bush was elected twice, once after he started this atrocious war, mitigates his ever being indicted in the Hague. Also, factor in the fact that he was enabled in his militarism by a completely compliant Republican majority in Congress. Thus his responsibility for the atrocity known as Iraq is dissipated from him to his Republican rubber-stampers and to the complacent American electorate at large.
ReplyDeleteConclusion: democratic government insulates war criminals.